HOLINESS OF CHRISTIANS IN THE PRESENT LIFE --No. 7
Way to Be Holy
by Charles Grandison Finney
President of Oberlin College
from "The
Oberlin Evangelist" Publication of Oberlin College
Lecture VII
March 29, 1843
.
Text.--Rom. 10:4: "For Christ is
the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth."
In this lecture I am to show,
I. What is not intended by the assertion that Christ is the end of the
law for righteousness.
II. What is intended by this assertion.
III. How Christ becomes the end of the law for righteousness.
I. What is not intended by the assertion that Christ is the end of the law
for righteousness.
- 1. Not that He abolishes the law in respect to believers. I am aware that
some antinomians in the Church, affirm this, but it cannot be true for the
following reasons.
- (1.) The moral law is not founded in the arbitrary will of God, for if
it were He would have no rule of conduct, nothing with which to compare his
own actions. But every moral agent must have some rule by which to act.
Again, He must have no character at all, for character implies moral
obligation, and moral obligation implies moral law. Again, unless the law is
obligatory on Him, benevolence in Him is not virtue, for virtue must be
compliance with obligation. Nor should we have any standard with which to
compare his actions, and by which to judge of them, so that we could know
whether He is holy or unholy. Moreover, if He is capable of Benevolence, it
is impossible that He should not be under a moral obligation to be so, and
if so, the law cannot, of course be founded in His arbitrary will.
Furthermore, He could, if the law were founded in his arbitrary will, by
willing it, make benevolence vice, and malevolence virtue, right wrong, and
wrong right. But this is absurd and impossible.
- (2.) The moral law is founded in God's self-existent nature. He never
made his own nature, and consequently never made the law, and it must
therefore be obligatory upon Him, by virtue of his own nature which imposes
it. It is as really obligatory on Him as on us.
- (3.) He requires benevolence of us because it is naturally obligatory on
us. He made us in his own image, that is, with a nature like His own, and
therefore He could not discharge us from obligation to keep the law if He
would, for our own reason would still reveal and impose it on us. We should
perceive its obligation.
- (4.) If He could and should abolish the moral law, then we could have no
moral character. We could neither be sinful nor holy any more than brutes
can. Observe then, Christ cannot be the end of the law in the sense that He
abolishes it.
- 2. It is not intended that He abolishes the penalty as it respects
believers, so that they can sin without actual condemnation. Some have this
view of justification, that at the first act of faith, God so sets aside the
penalty that it never afterwards attaches to the individual. But this cannot
be, for:
- (1.) If the penalty is set aside, the law is repealed, for law consists
of precept and penalty.
- (2.) If it were so set aside, then Christians, when they sinned would
not need pardon, and could not, without folly, and even wickedness pray for
forgiveness. It would be nothing else but sheer unbelief. But every
Christian knows that when he sins he is condemned, and must be pardoned or
damned. Christ, therefore, is not the end of the law in this sense.
- 3. Nor is He the end of the law for justification merely, for,
- (1.) He does not obtain for them a legal justification. Legal
justification is the act of pronouncing one just in the estimation of law.
This Christ cannot do in respect to any transgressor. Gospel justification
is pardon and acceptance. But it never was the end or object of the law to
pardon sinners. In this sense, then, it is impossible that Christ should be
the end of the law, for the law never aimed at pardoning transgressors. The
word righteousness sometimes means justification, but cannot mean that here,
as Christ never aimed at legal justification, nor the law at pardon. He
cannot, of course, then, be the end of the law in this sense.
- 4. Nor is He the end of the law in the sense of procuring a pardon for
those that believe, for this was never the end proposed by the law. The law
knows nothing of pardon.
- 5. Nor is it intended that He imputes his own righteousness or obedience
to them. Some suppose that Christ was under no obligation to obey the law
Himself, and that He can, therefore impute his obedience to believers. But,
- (1.) The law never aimed at imputation. This was no part of its object.
Did the law require Christ's righteousness or personal holiness to be
imputed?
- (2.) The doctrine of imputed righteousness is founded on the absurd
assumption that Christ owed no obedience to the law. But how can this be?
Was He under no obligation to be benevolent? If not, then his benevolence
was not virtue. He certainly was just as much bound to love God with all his
heart, and soul, and strength, and mind, and his neighbor as Himself, as you
are. How holy should God be? As holy as He can be. That is, He should be
perfectly benevolent, as the Bible says He is.
- (3.) This doctrine assumes that Christ's works were works of
supererogation. Is this what the Apostle means when he says--"For such a
High Priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from
sinners?"
- (4.) This doctrine is a mere dogma of Popery, born, bred, and supported
amid its darkness and superstitions. The sufferings and death of Christ were
for us, and constitute the Atonement. His obedience was necessary to his
making an atonement, as a condition, since none but a holy being could make
it. Holiness is benevolence, and Christ must of necessity have been
benevolent, in order to make the Atonement which is a work of benevolence.
- (5.) The doctrine of imputed righteousness represents God as requiring,
- (a) That Christ should render a perfect obedience for us.
- (b) Then that He should die just as if no such obedience had been
rendered.
- (c) That, notwithstanding the debt is thus paid twice over by our
substitute, we must repent as though it were unpaid.
- (d) Then that we must be forgiven.
- (e) And after all this, that we must ourselves obey, or be personally
holy.
- (f) And finally, that we must count it all grace.
What a jumble of nonsense is this! Is this the gospel of the blessed
God? Impossible!
- (6.) The doctrine of imputation utterly sets aside the true idea of the
gospel. The true idea of pardon does not enter into it. It is rather a
fivefold satisfaction of justice. We are not restored to the favor of God,
according to this doctrine, by a free pardon, but by imputed righteousness.
It is not at all wonderful that thinking men, when they hear such slang as
this, say, "O, nonsense!--If that be the gospel, we can have nothing to do
with it."
- (7.) Imputation is not, and never was, the end or object of the law. The
end which it seeks is righteousness or true obedience.
II. What is intended by the assertion that Christ is the end of the law
for righteousness.
The text affirms that he is the end of the law for righteousness. Righteousness
is obedience to the law. He is, then, the end of the law for obedience. He
secures the very end aimed at by the law; that is, He makes Christians holy; as
it is said--"There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ
Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the
spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending
his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the
flesh, that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not
after the flesh, but after the Spirit." What have we here? Why, an express
assertion of the Apostle, that Christ, by his Atonement, and indwelling Spirit,
had secured in Christians, the very obedience which the law required.
III. How Christ becomes the end of the law for righteousness or obedience.
- 1. Confidence or faith is essential to all hearty obedience to any law. An
outward conformity to its requirements may be secured by fear, but not love.
- 2. Christ, then, must secure love or true righteousness by inspiring
confidence in the character and government of God. God had been slandered by
Satan, and the world believed the slander. Satan represented to our first
parents that God was insincere in forbidding them to eat of the tree of
knowledge, and that the result of their eating of it would be just the reverse
of what God had threatened. Said he, "God doth know that in the day ye eat
thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as God, knowing good
and evil!" This was a most taking temptation! "And when the woman saw that the
tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be
desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat." Now the
thing to be done, is to remove this prejudice which has existed in all ages.
How shall it be effected?
- 3. Christ came to reveal the true God and the true character of his
government for this express purpose. He came not only to teach, but, by his
example, to give an illustration of what the law meant; and to possess the
human mind of the idea that God is love. He knew very well that confidence was
the thing needed; and that to reveal the character of God, so as to beget
confidence, He must hold it out in strong relief, in a life of love before
them. There was a greater necessity for this, because many of the
dispensations of God, towards mankind appeared severe. He had poured out the
waters of the flood upon the old world, and destroyed it; He had frowned upon
the cities of the plain, and sent them down to hell; and in many other
instances, He had been obliged to resort to such measures as were calculated,
in the circumstances, to beget a dread, and slavish fear, rather than to
inspire confidence and love. It was, therefore, necessary to adopt measures of
a different nature, adapted to beget faith.
- 4. The nature of faith, renders obedience certain, so far as it is
implicit. A wife, for example, is always perfectly under the influence of her
husband, just so far as she has confidence in him. Suppose he is a business
man; if she has confidence in his business talents, she does not concern
herself at all in his business transactions. So, if they are going a journey,
suppose she knows him to be careful, and attentive to his affairs, she will
not be in a fret; she will never ask whether he has taken care of their
baggage, and whether he has procured tickets, and accommodations. She expects
all this, as a matter of course, and is happy in her reliance on him. But
suppose we turn this over, and she has no confidence in his character. If he
is a man of business, and she lacks confidence in his judgment, she will be
all the time in distress for fear he will take some step which will ruin their
affairs. If they are going on a journey, she will, perhaps, fear that he will
start off without his pocket-book, or forget some of his baggage, or that he
will lose them on the way. It is easy to see, that so far as this lack of
confidence extends, its tendency is to diminish her affection, and if it
extend to his whole character, she cannot love him. I might illustrate this in
a thousand ways. If you call in a physician, and you have confidence in him,
you will take any medicine which he may prescribe. I recollect a case, which,
perhaps some of you are familiar with. A certain king was sick, and sent for
his physician. The physician examined his symptoms and found his disease a
dangerous one, and requiring a peculiar treatment. He told the king he would
go home and prepare a certain medicine, which would make him very sick, while
in its operation, but would remove the disease. While he was gone, the king
received a letter, warning him against the physician, as though he designed to
poison him. When the physician returned and presented him the medicine, he
immediately swallowed it, and then handed his physician the letter he had
received. That was faith; and it placed him entirely under the control of his
physician. It is easy, therefore, to see, that if Christ could only restore
faith among men, He would, of course, secure obedience.
- 5. Faith in God's character, is the foundation of faith in his promises.
Many people seem to go the wrong way to work. They try to exercise faith in
the promises, with faith in his general character. But Christ takes the
opposite course, revealing the character of God as a foundation of faith in
his promises.
- 6. He baptizes them by his Spirit, and actually works in them to will and
to do. How wonderfully Christ seems to work, to get the control of believers.
Unless He can get into their confidence, He cannot do this, but so soon as He
can inspire faith, He has them under his control. We see the same law among
men. See a human pair, by securing mutual confidence, wind imperishable cords
around each other's hearts. Then, for one to know the will of the other, is to
do it. They do not need to be bound down nor driven by the force of penalties.
This is the way of the seducer, who can "smile and smile and be a villain
still." He lays his foundation deep in the confidence of his victim, until he
may laugh at all her parents may say and do against him. He gains such an
ascendency, as to control the will more absolutely than if he could wield it
by his hand. Such is the natural result of getting into the confidence of
another. They will, and do, at our bidding. Thus Christ gains the heart, and
works in us to will and to do, of his good pleasure.
- 7. The way to be holy, then, is to believe. "Then said they unto Him, what
shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus said unto them, this
is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent." "That they may
receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified
by faith that is in me." "This only would I learn of you; received ye the
Spirit by the works of the law or by the hearing of faith? Are ye so foolish?
having begun in the Spirit, are ye made perfect by the flesh? Have ye suffered
so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain? He therefore that ministereth to
you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doth he it by the works of the
law, or by the hearing of faith? Even as Abraham believed God, and it was
accounted to him for righteousness. Know ye therefore that they which are of
faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, forseeing that
God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto
Abraham, saying, in thee shall all nations be blessed. So then they which be
of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. For as many as are of the works of
the law, are under the curse; for it is written, cursed is every one that
continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do
them. But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God it is
evident; for the just shall live by faith. And the law is not of faith; but
the man that doeth them shall live in them. Christ hath redeemed us from the
curse of the law, being made a curse for us; for it is written, cursed is
every one that hangeth on a tree; That the blessing of Abraham might come on
the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the
Spirit through faith." "What shall we say, then? That the Gentiles which
followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the
righteousness which is of faith; But Israel which followed after the law of
righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness. Wherefore?
Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the law; for they
stumbled at that stumbling-stone; As it is written, behold I lay in Sion a
stumbling-stone; and rock of offense, and whosoever believeth on Him shall not
be ashamed." In Christ, then the believer is complete; that is, He is all we
need. His offices and relations meet all our necessities, and by faith we
receive their redeeming influence.
REMARKS.
1. From this subject, we may see why the gospel lays so much stress on faith. It
is the only way of salvation.
2. This method of saving men is perfectly philosophical. And as we have seen,
Christ thus works Himself into the very heart of believers.
3. It is the only possible way, in the very nature of the case, to secure love.
God might command, and back up the command with threatenings. But this would
only fill the selfish mind with terror, leaving its selfishness unbroken, and
even grasping at its objects amid the roar of its thunders. In the very nature
of mind, then, to secure obedience, He must secure confidence. Why, look at Eve.
The moment she doubted, she fell. And so would all heaven fall if they should
lose confidence in God. Yes, they would fall! They would no more retain their
obedience, than the planets would retain their places, if the power of
gravitation were broken. Every one knows that if the power of attraction were
destroyed, suns, and stars, and planets would run lawless through the universe,
and desolation would drive her ploughshare through creation. So, break the power
of confidence in heaven, and every angel there would fall like Lucifer, and
universal anarchy prevail.
4. What I have said, does not represent virtue or holiness as consisting in mere
emotions of complacency; or in loving God merely for his favors; but the
exhibition of his character in Christ begets in us real benevolence. It shows us
what benevolence is, and stimulates us to exercise it. Nearly all preachers and
writers, of the present day, confound religion, with mere complacency in God for
his favors. Both gratitude and complacency may, and often do, exist in the
impenitent mind. It must, therefore, be a fundamental mistake, to confound these
with true religion.
5. Christ, by exhibiting his benevolence, begets his own image in them that
believe; that is, they are naturally led to yield themselves up to the
transforming tendency of this view of his character. This, the law could never
secure in a selfish mind.
6. I said the doctrine of imputed righteousness, is another gospel, or no gospel
at all. And here I would ask, is not this quite another way of salvation?
According to this way, instead of imputing righteousness to them, God makes them
righteous.
7. The gospel is not an evasion of the law. It comes in as an auxiliary to
accomplish what the law aims at, but cannot effect, because it is "weak through
the flesh."
8. We see who are true believers. Those who love God supremely and their
neighbor as themselves; and unless your faith begets obedience, it is not the
faith of the gospel.
9. We can see the sustaining power of faith. This is not well considered by
many. If the head of a family secures its confidence, he controls it easily; but
if not, there is a perpetual tendency to resist him. The same principle operates
in state governments. They are firm, just so far and no farther, than they are
based upon the confidence of their subjects. So it is in the business world.
Every thing is prosperous, so long as confidence is secured. This gone, and the
tide immediately sets forth the other way. Why are so many houses in this
country, which were once supposed to be perfectly stable, tumbling down around
the heads of the merchants? Because confidence is destroyed. Restore that, and
immediately things will assume a different aspect. Every merchant in New York
will feel the impulse; and ships from abroad will come freighted down with
merchandize. This principle is equally efficient and necessary in the divine
government. This, the devil well understood. Hence his first effort was directed
to its overthrow. But ministers too often put it in the back ground, and hence
the reason of so much failure in the work of reforming the world. Christ, on the
other hand, always put it foremost, and his declaration, "He that believeth
shall be saved," is the unalterable law of his government.
10. Unbelievers cannot be saved, for their want of confidence, necessarily keeps
the soul from hearty obedience.
11. Do you ask, "How can I believe?" I turn on you, and ask, "How can you help
believing?" Christ has died for you to win your confidence. He stands at your
door, offering blessings, and assuring you of his good will. And can't you
believe! What! And the Son of God at the door! But perhaps you stand away back,
and say, Christians can believe, but how can I? a poor, guilty wretch. And why
not you? Come, let your anchor down upon the character of God, and then if the
winds blow, let them blow; if the ocean tosses itself, and yawns till it lays
bare its very bottom, you are secure, for God rules the wind and the waves. But
I hear some one say, I am such a backslider. Yes, and you are like to be. Unless
you believe, you will continue to go right away from God. Come, instantly, and
believe. Come all you professors; come, all you sinners; come now, and He will
write his law in your hearts; and it will no longer be to you a law on tables of
stone. Can't you believe it? Yes, O yes. Then let us come around the throne of
grace, and receive Christ, as the end of the law for righteousness.
[Various Sermons
Index] - [E-Book Index]
Various Sermons by Charles G. Finney - Compiled by Adam Woeger - Public
Domain [Copy Freely]